We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Lloyd's Law Reports RSS feed

BTN AND ANOTHER v BTP AND ANOTHER

Arbitration – Tribunal ruling that it was bound by decisions of the Malaysian Industrial Court – Whether tribunal had jurisdiction – Procedural irregularity – Public policy.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1

K v A

Sale of goods (fob) – Payment of price – Seller emailing invoice to broker directing buyer to make payment to specified bank account – Fraudster intercepting email and directing payment to be made to fraudulent account – Buyer making payment to fraudulent account – Whether risk of fraud on buyer or seller – Whether buyer complied with contractual payment obligation – Whether arbitration tribunal erred in law – Whether serious irregularity – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 and 69.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 28

LEIDOS INC v THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC

Arbitration – Enforcement of award – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 101 and 103 – Costs – CPR 44 and 62.18.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 37

BNA v BNB AND ANOTHER

Arbitration – Law applicable to arbitration agreement – Whether applicable law followed main agreement or seat – Whether seat of arbitration in PRC or Singapore.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 55

MINISTER OF FINANCE AND ANOTHER v INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM INVESTMENT CO AND ANOTHER

Challenge to arbitration award – Jurisdiction and serious irregularity – Parties agreeing that disputes arising about an award were to be arbitrated – Whether English court should stay proceedings pending second arbitration – Whether anti-arbitration should be granted – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 67 and 68 – Senior Courts Act 1981, section 37.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 93

GN v ZU (AS ADMINISTRATOR IN THE INSOLVENCY OF NIKI LUFTFAHRT GMBH)

Carriage of passengers by air – Air carrier liability in the event of accidents – Concept of “accident” – Spillage of a cup of coffee placed on the tray table of a seat – Bodily injuries caused to the passenger – Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air 1999 (Montreal Convention), article 17(1).

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124

WILMAR TRADING PTE LTD v HEROIC WARRIOR INC (THE “BUM CHIN”)

Sale of goods (fob) – Damage to goods – No bills of lading issued – Whether implied contract between buyers and shipowner – Title to sue – Whether buyers entitled to sue shipowner in contract and/or in tort – Whether shipowner owed duty of care to buyers – Whether shipowner in breach of duty of care.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 130

CLASSIC MARITIME INC v LIMBUNGAN MAKMUR SDN BHD AND ANOTHER

Charterparty – Contract of affreightment – Long-term contract for carriage of iron ore pellets from Brazil to Malaysia – Bursting of dam stopping production of iron ore – Owner claiming damages from charterer for failure to make shipments following dam burst – Whether charterer entitled to rely on force majeure clause – Whether owner entitled to substantial damages.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 178

GA-HYUN CHUNG v SILVER DRY BULK CO LTD

Arbitration – Jurisdiction – Validity of appointment of arbitrator – Whether claimant's challenge was to “substantive jurisdiction” – Whether effect of Marshall Islands statute was to extend life of company after dissolution to enable arbitration proceedings to be served on it – Arbitration Act 1996, section 67.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 193

HARMONY INNOVATION SHIPPING PTE LTD v CARAVEL SHIPPING INC (THE “UNIVERSAL BREMEN”)

Practice – Mandatory injunction – Letter of indemnity – Cargo of coal discharged without bills of lading – Head charterer and sub-charterer providing back-to-back letters of indemnity – Bank arresting vessel in Singapore – Court granting head charterer mandatory injunction requiring sub-charterer to provide security and take all necessary steps to secure release of vessel – Sub-charterer applying to discharge injunction – Whether triable issue that cargo had been delivered – Whether injunction should be discharged.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 206

REPUBLIC OF KOREA v DAYYANI AND OTHERS

Arbitration – Jurisdiction – Bilateral investment treaty – Meaning of “investment” – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 – Arbitration Act 1996, section 67.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 212

AXA SA v GENWORTH FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS AND ANOTHER AXA FRANCE IARD (AS TRANSFEREE OF THE BUSINESS OF FINANCIAL INSURANCE CO LTD) AND OTHERS (NAMED THIRD PARTIES)

Sale and purchase agreement – Payment protection insurance – Sellers covenanting to pay on demand 90 per cent of PPI claims to purchasers – Whether obligation to pay was an indemnity – Whether sellers had subrogation rights – Whether sellers acted reasonably in withholding consent to agreements by buyers.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 229

KABAB-JI SAL (LEBANON) v KOUT FOOD GROUP (KUWAIT)

Arbitration – Enforcement of award – Whether arbitration clause applied to contracting party's parent company – Law applicable to arbitration agreement – Effect of entire agreement clause on arbitration agreement in the main contract – Effect of No Oral Modification clause – Whether judge should have made a final determination – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 7 and 103(2)(b).

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 269

OZMEN ENTERTAINMENT PTY LTD AND ANOTHER v NEPTUNE HOSPITALITY PTY LTD (THE “SEADECK”)

Joint venture – Fiduciary duty – Second applicant and respondent entering into joint venture agreement to operate business offering luxury cruises on Sydney Harbour – First applicant demise-chartering vessel to second applicant and respondent jointly for purpose of joint venture – Whether respondent in breach of joint venture agreement – Whether respondent in breach of fiduciary duty – Whether joint venture agreement validly terminated by second applicant – Whether charterparty validly terminated by first applicant.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 287

VTB COMMODITIES TRADING DAC v JSC ANTIPINSKY REFINERY

Arbitration – Jurisdiction – Application to court for preliminary ruling on jurisdiction – Whether arbitration agreement repudiated – Scope of arbitration clause – Arbitration Act 1996, section 32.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 332

A AND ANOTHER v C AND OTHERS

Arbitration – Court's power to order evidence – Whether power available against a third party – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 2(3), 43, 44 and 82 – CPR 34.8.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 341

ODYSSEY AVIATION LTD v GFG 737 LTD

Sale of aircraft – Aircraft Sale and Purchase Agreement – Buyer purporting to terminate agreement for seller's breach of warranty as to title and for failing to fulfil conditions precedent – Whether termination valid – Seller purporting to terminate agreement for buyer's failure to pay balance of purchase price – Whether termination valid – Whether seller entitled to summary judgment for return of deposit – Whether buyer entitled to summary judgment for return of deposit.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 363

RUBICON VANTAGE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD v KRISENERGY LTD

Guarantee – Parent company of bareboat charterer providing guarantee to owner – Owner making demand on guarantor in respect of works carried out to vessel prior to commencement of charter – Whether “on-demand” or “see-to-it” guarantee – Whether demand valid – Whether guarantor liable.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 383

FILATONA TRADING LTD AND ANOTHER v NAVIGATOR EQUITIES LTD AND OTHERS

Arbitration – Jurisdiction – Share purchase agreement – Disclosed and identified principal – Whether wording of agreement precluding intervention and reliance on that contract by disclosed and identified principal – Arbitration Act 1996, section 67.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 418

FEYHA MARITIME LTD v MILOUBAR CENTRAL FEEDMILL LTD AND ANOTHER

Carriage of goods by sea – Limitation of action – Plaintiff bringing cargo claim against carrier within one-year limitation period – Cargo insurer bringing separate claim against carrier within limitation period – Court ruling that plaintiff not owner of cargo – Application to amend claim after expiry of limitation period to add new party as plaintiff – Whether amendment should be allowed – Whether cargo insurer's claim stopped limitation running – Hague-Visby Rules, article III, rule 6.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 449

PRIYANKA SHIPPING LTD v GLORY BULK CARRIERS PTE LTD (THE “CSK GLORY”)

Sale of ship – Buyer contracting to scrap vessel and not to use her for trading – Buyer trading vessel in breach of agreement – Whether seller entitled to injunction – Whether damages adequate remedy – Whether seller entitled to “negotiating damages” – Whether buyer entitled to declaration that seller limited to nominal damages.

[2020] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 461