We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Dispute Resolution

Arbitration Law Service Issue 93 now available

Service Issue 93 (March 2023) now published
https://static.i-law.com/ilawResponsive/prod/publications/Mar-2023/15/0fc3347f-c93e-406b-9115-69c3e1aabfca-ARB.jpg

Service Issue 93 of Arbitration Law reflects on changes suggested by the Law Commission's Consultation Paper 257, concerning proposals to reform the English Arbitration Act 1996.

Recent cases discussed include:

2022 review of Hong Kong SAR arbitration case law

Now published in Arbitration Law Monthly
https://static.i-law.com/ilawResponsive/prod/publications/Mar-2023/1/dc8a1de2-4c46-47f2-a1a4-1f50f1a43245-240x160.jpg

This special feature explores selected arbitration-related court decision highlights and legislative initiatives in 2022, which will likely have significant ramifications for the arbitration community. 

Written by Edward Liu, Maggie Lee, Manly Lam and Bridget Yim, Haiwen & Partners LLP

Arbitration Law Monthly

Breach of arbitration clause: anti-suit injunction

The facts of QBE Europe SA/NV v Generali Espana de Seguros y Reaseguros [2022] EWHC 2062 (Comm) were fairly typical of those arising where a policy issued by marine insurers contains London arbitration provisions and an attempt is made by a third party to claim against the insurers in judicial proceedings in some other jurisdiction and based on the direct actions legislation of that jurisdiction. FoxtonJ, applying well-established principles, held that relief in the form of an anti-suit injunction should be granted.
Online Published Date: 
22 Mar 2023
   |   
Appeared in issue: 

Enforcement of peremptory orders: effect of jurisdictional challenge

S3D Interactive Inc v Oovee Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1665 was an appeal from the decision of Butcher J in RQP v ZYX [2022] EWHC 2949 (Comm), previously discussed in Arbitration Law Monthly, raising the question whether an outstanding challenge to the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal precludes the enforcement by the court, under section 42 of the Arbitration Act 1996 of a peremptory order made by the tribunal.
Online Published Date: 
22 Mar 2023
   |   
Appeared in issue: 

Dispute Resolution Search

cancel

Current issue available

Arbitration Law Monthly
https://static.i-law.com/ilawResponsive/prod/publications/Feb-2023/14/ac1a8c44-e812-45f0-9d8c-af84682c5140-ALM_2301160240.jpg

Arbitration Law Monthly is a specially designed information service that provides you with critical and essential analysis of global arbitration court decisions. Covering a wide range of industries including construction, banking, energy, gas, insurance, oil and shipping, Arbitration Law Monthly offers you a convenient round-up of news, information and analysis in an easy-to-read format.

The most recent issue of Arbitration Law Monthly is available here.