- Home/Publications/Building Law Monthly
The meaning of ‘appropriate deduction’
In Mul v Hutton Construction Ltd [2014] EWHC 1797 (TCC), Akenhead J held that the words ‘appropriate deduction’ in cl 2.30 of the JCT Intermediate Form of Contract (2005) meant a deduction which was reasonable in all the circumstances..
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014
No duty to negotiatein good faith
In Knatchbull-Hugessen v SISU Capital Ltd [2014] EWHC 1194 (QB), Leggatt J declined to imply into the contract between the parties a term that the parties would conduct negotiations in good faith and, in particular, that the claimant would not do..
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014
Trees and the reasonable and prudent landowner
In Stagecoach South Western Trains Ltd v Hind [2014] EWHC 1891 (TCC), Coulson J held that the duty owed by the defendant landowner to the claimant extended no further than carrying out periodic informal or preliminary inspections of the trees in her..
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014
Interim injunctions and the adequacy of damages
In AB v CD [2014] EWCA Civ 229; [2014] BLR 313, the Court of Appeal held that the ‘rule’ that an injunction should not be granted where damages would be an adequate remedy should be applied in a way which reflects the substantial justice..
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014
Appeals to theSupreme Court
Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction plc
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014
Appeals to theSupreme Court
Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV
Online Published Date:
10 July 2014
Appeared in issue:
Vol 31 No 7 - 07 July 2014