- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc v Qantas Airways Ltd - US Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)(O'Scannlain, Gould and Ikuta Ct JJ) - 10 February 2011
On 14 November 2004 UPS’s predecessor-in-interest contracted with Air New Zealand Engineering Ltd to ship a turbine aircraft engine from New Zealand to the United States. UPS’s predecessor in turn contracted with Qantas to perform the..
Online Published Date:
29 April 2011
Appeared in issue:
820 - 29 April 2011
Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and Ors - Hong SAR Court of First Instance (Reyes J) - 30 September 2010
In February 2009 Galsworthy Ltd ("Galsworthy") commenced London arbitration proceedings against the plaintiff ("Parakou") claiming damages for a wrongful repudiation of a charterparty said to be contained in, or evidenced by, a fixture recap made..
Online Published Date:
29 April 2011
Appeared in issue:
820 - 29 April 2011
Valency International Trading Pte Ltd v Alton International Resources Pte Ltd - High Court of Singapore)(Jordan Tan AR) - 3 March 2011
On 27 July 2009 the plaintiff buyers and the defendant sellers agreed that the defendants would sell to the plaintiffs 65,000 mts of iron ore fines at US$86 per mt with a laycan period from 1 to 10 August 2009.
On 31 July 2009 the defendants..
Online Published Date:
29 April 2011
Appeared in issue:
820 - 29 April 2011
Albemarle Corporation and Anr v AstraZeneca UK Ltd - US Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)(Niemeyer and King Ct JJ Robert J Conrad Jr Chief US DJ for WD North Carolina) - 8 December 2010
In 2005 AstraZeneca, a United Kingdom company, contracted to purchase a quantity of di-isopropyl-phenol (“DIP”) from Albemarle, a Virginia corporation. The contract provided that if AstraZeneca ceased using DIP in favour of propofol, a..
Online Published Date:
29 April 2011
Appeared in issue:
820 - 29 April 2011
In re Sojitz Corporation v Prithvi Information Solutions Ltd - Supreme Court of New York (Appellate Division)(Renwick J) - 10 March 2011
Disputes arose between the petitioner, a Japanese company, and the respondent, an Indian company, arising out of a contract made in India, whereby the petitioner agreed to provide telecommunications equipment produced in China to the respondent in..
Online Published Date:
29 April 2011
Appeared in issue:
820 - 29 April 2011