- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
The Kherson - Q.B.D. (Adm.Ct.) (Sheen J.) -
1 May 1992
The plaintiff cargo interests complained that their cargo had been contaminated while laden in the defendants’ ship Kerch
. The plaintiffs were Dutch companies and the Kerch
was owned by the Georgian State Shipping Co.
There was a..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
Philips Export BV v. The Port of Singapore Authority - High Court (Goh Joon Seng J.) -
26 March 1992
The plaintiff’s cargo was stored in a container which had been discharged from the carrying vessel and delivered to the Port of Singapore Authority’s (“P.S.A.”) container terminal at Keppel Wharves, Singapore...
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
Great River Shipping Inc. v. Sunnyface Marine Ltd. (The Great Eagle) - Cape Provincial Division (King J.) - 12 December 1991
The owners of the vessel Great Eagle
applied for the setting aside of the arrest of the vessel on the ground inter alia
that the respondent was not entitled to arrest the vessel by reason of section 3(8) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
17/92
The vessel was chartered on the Sugar Charterparty, clause 17 of which provided:
Ship’s holds to be odourless and free from insects, properly swept, cleaned and dried to the satisfaction of shippers’ or charterers’ agents before..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
18/92
On 15 May the vessel was sub-chartered by disponent owners on the Sugar Charterparty, clause 17 of which provided:
Ship’s holds to be odourless and free from insects, properly swept, cleaned and dried to the satisfaction of shippers or..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
19/92
The vessel was chartered on the Gencon form for the carriage of a minimum quantity of 6,500 metric tons of tapioca, up to the ship’s full cargo capacity in the charterer’s option. The freight was payable on a lumpsum F.I.O.S. basis.
The..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992
20/92
The shipowners claimed damages for detention at the discharge port. The vessel arrived at 16 20 on 9 November and waited until 26 November before the receivers accepted the notice of readiness. The delay arose as a result of a dispute over the sale..
Online Published Date:
30 May 1992
Appeared in issue:
328 - 30 May 1992