- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
New South Wales Leather Co. Pty Ltd. v. Vanguard Insurance Co. Ltd. - Supreme Ct. of New South Wales (Adm.Div.) (Carruthers J.) - 16 March 1990
The plaintiffs were importers of leather. They took out an open “Marine Policy” with the defendant insurance company. The policy contained a goods “lost or not lost” clause.
The plaintiffs entered into contracts for the..
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990
Morewitz v. West of England Shipowners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) - U.S. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit) (Tjoflat, Johnson and Eschbach C.JJ.) - 13 March 1990
This action arose out of the sinking of the vessel Imbros
, with the death of all crew members, somewhere off Bermuda in December 1975. The plaintiff was the appointed administrator of the estates of the deceased crewmen. He brought a wrongful death..
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990
Hoffman-Laroche Inc. v. M/V TEL Jefferson and others - U.S. District Ct. (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter D.J.) - 23 January 1990
The plaintiff sought damages from Panalpina Ltd. and Panalpina A.G. (collectively “Panalpina”) for, inter alia
, the loss of a shipment of pharmaceuticals during a voyage of the vessel TFL Jefferson
from Bremerhaven to New York...
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990
4/90
The vessel arrived at the outer anchorage of the discharge port at 07 20 on 20 April and tendered a notice of readiness which was not accepted until 08 00 on May 6 (by which time the vessel had berthed). The vessel had waited at the anchorage (some..
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990
5/90
The vessel was chartered on the Ferticon form to carry a cargo of bulk sulphur to “one/two safe berths each one/two safe ports/safe anchorages East Coast India . . . in Charterers’ option.
The charterers nominated Haldia. The vessel..
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990
6/90
One of the arguments raised by the owners in London Arbitration 5/90 was whether the charterers were estopped from contending that the notice was invalid by reason of their conduct in making no comment for a month and a half after they had received..
Online Published Date:
05 May 1990
Appeared in issue:
274 - 05 May 1990