- Home/Publications/LLR: Insurance & Reinsurance Plus
AIG EUROPE (IRELAND) LTD v FARADAY CAPITAL LTD
Reinsurance – Claims cooperation clause – Reinsured required
to notify losses within 30 days or as soon as reasonably practicable – Claims made
against assured by third parties – Settlement reached between assured – Date of
loss – Whether reinsured in breach of clause.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 1
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY CO OF CANADA v SUN LIFE ASSURANCE CO OF CANADA (UK) LTD
Insurance (liability) – Global excess policy issued
to Canadian parent company and worldwide subsidiaries – English subsidiary
incurring losses following review of sale of investment contracts ordered by
Financial Services Authority – Whether English or Ontario law applied to policy
– Whether assured in breach of warranty as to knowledge of circumstances which
could give rise to liability – Whether assured in breach of obligation to
notify claims as soon as practicable – Quantum.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 2
PLYMOUTH & SOUTH WEST CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v ARCHITECTURE, STRUCTURE & MANAGEMENT LTD
Insurance (professional indemnity) – Judgment obtained
against insolvent assured – Sum awarded plus estimated costs in excess of
policy limits – Whether costs order could be made directly against liability
insurers – Supreme Court Act 1981, section 51.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 3
RE BALLAST ST PAUL TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO LTD v DARGAN
Insurance – Subrogation – Insurers indemnifying assured
and seeking to exercise subrogation rights against third party – Assured
becoming insolvent and going into liquidation – Liquidators wishing to disclaim
contract with third party giving rise to subrogation rights – Whether insurers having
equitable right over cause of action – Insolvency Act 1986, sections 178 and
181.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 4
HORBURY BUILDING SYSTEMS LTD v HAMPDEN INSURANCE NV
Insurance (products liability) – Assured installed
ceilings in cinema complex – One ceiling collapsed resulting in closure of
entire complex – Whether insurers required to indemnify assured against
liability to third parties for losses arising from closure of cinema – Whether
appropriate to grant declaration in advance of claim against assured.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 5
BOLTON METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL v MUNICIPAL MUTUAL INSURANCE LTD
Insurance (public liability) – Victim exposed to
asbestos and contracting illness some years later – Different public liability
policies in force at each date – Whether claim by victim covered by earlier or
later policy – Whether development of disease following exposure “accidental” –
Whether condition precedent requiring immediate notification of loss waived by
denial of coverage – Whether right of contribution existed.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 6
MARINA OFFSHORE PTE LTD v CHINA INSURANCE CO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
Insurance (marine) – Whether loss caused by perils of the
sea – Whether policy mixed time and voyage or just time – Whether vessel unseaworthy
– Whether vessel sent to sea in unseaworthy condition with privity
of assured – Marine Insurance Act 1906, sections 25 and 39.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 7
GOSHAWK DEDICATED LTD AND OTHERS v TYSER & CO LTD AND ANOTHER
Insurance brokers – Placing, claims and accounting
documents in possession of brokers – Whether underwriters legal or equitable
owners of documents – Whether implied obligation on assureds to disclose
documents to underwriters – Whether implied contract between brokers and undewriters that brokers would provide documents on behalf
of assureds – Effect of Terms of Business Agreements 2001
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 8
MARKEL INTERNATIONAL CO LTD v CRAFT (THE “NORSEMAN”)
Insurance
(liability) – Conflict of laws – Anti-suit injunction – Direct action
brought against liability insurers in Tunisia – Insurance policy
containing arbitration clause – Insurers arguing that Tunisian law allowed
direct action free of arbitration clause – Whether injunction should be granted.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 9
KR v ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE PLC
Insurance (liability) – Policy taken out by company
operating care home – Policy excluding liability of insurers for deliberate
acts and omissions – Controller of company committing deliberate acts of abuse
against children – Claimants obtaining judgment against company – Company becoming
insolvent – Whether claimants entitled to enforce judgment against insurers –
Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 10
PHILLIPS v (1) RAFIQ (2) MOTOR INSURERS’ BUREAU
Insurance (motor) – Registered owner of vehicle
uninsured for use of vehicle – Owner killed while passenger in vehicle being
driven by uninsured driver – Claim against driver under Fatal Accidents Act
1976 – Whether Motor Insurers’ Bureau liable to satisfy judgment – Uninsured
Drivers Agreement 1999, clause 6.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 11
KONKOLA COPPER MINES PLC AND OTHERS v COROMIN LTD AND OTHERS
Reinsurance – Conflict of laws – Jurisidction
– Whether reinsurance incorporated exclusive jurisdiction clause nominating
Zambia – Whether English court should hear action despite clause – Burden of
proving existence of clause – Standard of proof.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 12
ENTERPRISE OIL LTD v STRAND INSURANCE CO LTD
Insurance (liability) – Settlement reached by assured
in respect of proceedings in Texas – Claim against liability insurers – Whether
insurers’ liability based on proof of assured’s
actual liability or proof that Texas could reasonably have reached a finding of
liability – Whether assured faced liability in tort under Texas law – Whether
coverage of policy for contractual liability extended to settlements – Whether
settlement had to allocate losses as between the various claims made against
the assured – Whether assured could recover defence costs.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 13
This Lloyd’s Law Reports Insurance and Reinsurance Plus judgment has now been reported at [2007] Lloyd’s Rep IR 186. Please click here to view the judgment.
ENGLISH AND AMERICAN INSURANCE CO LTD v AXA RE SA
Reinsurance –
Reinsured entering into agreement with assured to pay proportion of claims –
Agreement based on terms of market agreement not involving the reinsured –
Without prejudice privilege – Whether offers by reinsurers to settle were
admissible in evidence – Whether settlement reached by reinsured – Whether
reinsurers bound to follow settlement under follow the settlements clause.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 14
DORNOCH LTD v MAURITIUS UNION ASSURANCE CO LTD (NO 2)
Reinsurance – Excess
of loss reinsurance cover for property losses – Employee systematically
defrauded assured bank by removing money from accounts – Whether losses
amounting to property losses – Whether losses could be aggregated so as to
exceed deductible – Whether 72-hour clause prevented recovery of losses
discovered more than 72 hours after occurrence
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 15
BRIT SYNDICATES LTD v GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL
Insurance (professional indemnity) – Policy taken out
by firm covering itself and all member firms – Policy insuring parent against
claims made against a member firm insured under the policy – Member firm’s
cover avoided for breach of duty of good faith – Whether firm itself still
entitled to protection.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 16
BEE v JENSON
Insurance (motor) – Claimant’s policy
covering costs of hiring replacement car – Whether defendant liable to
indemnify claimant for hire charges.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 17
BARTOLINE LTD v ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC
Insurance (liability) – Assured causing pollution to
land and watercourses – Assured incurring clean-up costs and other expenses on
the instructions of the Environment Agency – Liability policy covering assured’s liability against legal liability for damages –
Whether liability to Environment Agency constituted damages – Water Resources
Act 1991, sections 161 and 161A.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 18
MOORE v (1) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT (2) MOTOR INSURERS’ BUREAU
Insurance (motor) – Hit and run driver – Victim
claiming from Motor Insurers Bureau under Untraced Drivers Agreement 1972 –
Claim by victim against UK Government for failing to implement Second EC Motor Directive
84/5/EEC – Whether action time-barred –
Limitation Act 1980.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 19
STAATSSECRETARIS VAN FINANCIEN v ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO
Insurance – Value added tax – Life insurer contracted
out “back office” functions to consultancy – Whether VAT payable on services
provided by consultancy – Whether consultancy an employee of insurer – Whether
consultancy party to insurance and reinsurance transactions – Whether carrying
on services provided by broker or agent – Sixth Council VAT Directive 77/388/EEC,
articles 4 and 13B.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 20
KYLE BAY LTD v UNDERWRITERS SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO 019057/08/01
Insurance (business interruption) – Claim compromised
under final settlement on basis of gross profits cover subject to average –
Policy found to provide indemnity on declaration-linked basis not subject to
average – Whether settlement void for mistake or voidable
for misrepresentation.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 21
FARRELL v (1) WHITTY (2) MOTOR INSURERS’ BUREAU OF IRELAND
Insurance (motor) – Passenger injured in vehicle not equipped
for carrying passengers – Driver uninsured – Claim against Irish Motor
Insurers’ Bureau – Whether compulsory insurance scheme extended to persons being
carried in all vehicles – Council Directive 84/9/EEC,
article 5 – Whether Uninsured Drivers Agreement subject to Directive.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 22
MERRILL LYNCH INTERNATIONAL BANK LTD v WINTERTHUR SWISS INSURANCE CO
Insurance (credit indemnity) – Policy taken out to cover
bankruptcy and default risks – Whether events falling within terms of cover – Whether
due notice given to insurers – Whether sum payable by insurers was to be
reduced by actual payment later made by debtor – Date of running of interest –
Supreme Court Act 1981, section 35A.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 23
C A BLACKWELL (CONTRACTS) LTD v GERLING GENERAL INSURANCE CO
Insurance (construction) – Road damaged by bad weather –
Whether assured had “all risks” policy – Whether loss fortuitous even though bad
weather was foreseeable – Whether assured guilty of wilful misconduct – Whether
property subject to defects within meaning of exclusion.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 24
566935 BC LTD v ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO OF CANADA
Insurance (marine) – Barge sunk at its moorings due to ingress
of water – Insurance against perils of the sea – Hull
of barge rotten – Water ingress controlled by pump – Whether loss of vessel was
fortuitous – Whether power supply to pump had been interrupted.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 25
EQUITAS LTD v HORACE HOLMAN & CO LTD
Insurance (brokers) – Duty of brokers to maintain
proper and adequate records of reinsurance recoveries – Whether records
adequate – Whether sums paid by reinsurers not passed on by brokers – Costs of
the proceedings – CPR Part 44.3.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 26
ARBORY GROUP LTD v WEST CRAVEN INSURANCE SERVICES
Insurance (business interruption) – Failure by broker to obtain
cover for full amount of loss – Measure of damages against broker – Whether
insurers had separate insurable interest defence against assured – Whether
broker liable for loss of profits in addition to loss of policy monies –
Whether assured guilty of contributory negligence.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 27
BRAIN v YORKSHIRE RIDER LTD
Insurance (motor) – Claimant’s vehicle damaged in motor
accident – Claimant incurred costs in hiring replacement vehicle – Whether
claimant acted reasonably in hiring expensive vehicle – Mitigation of loss.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 28
ANDERS & KERN UK LTD v CGU INSURANCE PLC
Insurance (property) – Policy clause requiring assured
to maintain intruder alarm when premises were unoccupied unless there was
violence or a threat of violence – Whether disabling intruder alarm amounted to
threat of violence – Whether clause subject to reasonableness requirement –
Whether clause incorporated into policy.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 29
NOBLEBRIGHT LTD v SIRIUS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION LLOYD’S SYNDICATE 1200
Insurance (property)
– Proposal form asking assured to disclose facts relating to earlier claims –
Assured not disclosing armed robberies in respect of which no claim was made –
Whether information waived by express questions.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 30
EVANS v TNT LOGISTICS LTD ADMIRAL INSURANCE SERVICES LTD
Insurance (motor) – Claim for damages for cost of
hiring replacement car – Defendant offering claimant replacement vehicle free
of charge to claimant – Claimant hiring his own replacement car – Whether claimant
failed to mitigate loss – Measure of damages – Whether cost to defendant of
supplying replacement car to be disregarded.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 31
BEE v JENSON (NO 2)
Insurance (motor) – Subrogation – Assured’s
vehicle damaged by third party – Assured’s insurers
paying for cost of hiring replacement vehicle – Insurers seeking to recover sum
paid from third party – Whether amount recoverable to be reduced by benefits
received by insurers.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 32
NOBLE ASSURANCE CO v GERLING-KONZERN GENERAL INSURANCE CO
Reinsurance – Arbitration – Insurance policy covering
assured and subsidiaries – Loss suffered by subsidiary– Assured issuing insurance
certificate policy after loss – Dispute as to coverage referred to arbitration
– Arbitrators ruling that subsidiary covered under terms of policy and under
terms of certificate policy – Reinsurers bringing action in Vermont based on
validity of certificate policy – Whether reinsurers estopped
from raising issue – Whether anti-suit injunction or declaration should be
granted.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 33
WASA INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD v LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO AGF INSURANCE LTD v LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO
Reinsurance – Reinsured providing property cover for
three-year period to assured – Proportional reinsurance written as original and
follow the settlements, but covering property damage occurring during currency
of the reinsurance – US court holding reinsured liable for property damage
dating back 50 years before inception of cover – Reinsured settling – Whether
reinsurers bound by settlement – Whether deductible clause in reinsurance
applied per occurrence – Whether reinsurers liable for defence costs.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 34
HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LTD v JLT RISK SOLUTIONS LTD
Insurance and reinsurance brokers – Brokers placing
both direct risk and reinsurance – Brokers becoming aware of breaches of
warranty in insurance and reinsurance – Brokers not specifically drawing
information to reinsured’s attention – Whether
brokers owed duty of care to keep reinsured informed – Whether duty broken –
Causation and contributory negligence.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 35
FISK v BRIAN THORNHILL & SON
Insurance (property) – Producing broker sending false
information on construction of building to placing broker – Risk placed –
Placing broker renewing cover with new insurers without informing assured or
producing broker of new insurers or new terms – Flood – Insurers avoiding
liability – Producing broker settling with assured – Whether placing broker
liable in damages or to contribute to placing broker – Causation.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 36
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TATE GALLERY v DUFFY CONSTRUCTION LTD
Insurance (construction) – Policy insuring employer and
contractor against loss caused by flood and burst pipes – Tate Gallery flooded
when pipe became detached from main – Whether flood or burst pipe – Effect of
failure by contractor to take reasonable care, in breach of policy terms –
Whether insurers entitled to exercise subrogation rights against contractor.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 37
AEGIS ELECTRICAL AND GAS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD v CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO
Reinsurance – Full reinsurance clause – Definition of
risk in reinsurance – Whether definition overriding incorporation of direct
policy wording – Follow the settlements – Whether clause unconditional –
Whether reinsurers bound to accept settlement by reinsured as conclusive of
coverage under reinsurance – Meaning of “explosion”.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 38
TAPPOO HOLDINGS LTD v STUCHBERY
Insurance (material damage) – Fijian Parliament seized
and Government members taken hostage – Law and order breaking down – Assured’s premises damaged by rioters and looters in Suva –
All risks policy excluding liability for loss directly or indirectly caused by insurrection
– Whether events amounted to insurrection – Causation – Effect of Insurance Law
Reform Act 1996, section 25 (Fiji).
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 39
KOSMAR VILLA HOLIDAYS PLC v TRUSTEES OF SYNDICATE 1243
Insurance (liability) – Policy containing condition
precedent requiring immediate notification of occurrence of injury or damage –
Notice of injury not given for over a year after occurrence – Whether insurers
had waived breach by reason of pre-contractual or post-loss conduct – Whether
waiver by election of condition precedent possible – Whether insurers estopped from denying liability.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 40
BYRNE v MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU AND ANOTHER
Insurance (motor) – Motor Insurers Bureau Untraced
Drivers Agreement – Victim injured aged three – MIB Agreement containing
three-year time bar – Action not brought for thirteen years – Whether
three-year time bar consistent with Second Motor Insurance Directive – Whether
Agreement to be construed to comply with Directive – Whether Directive
enforceable against MIB – Whether UK Government liable in damages – Council
Directive 84/5/EC
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 41
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TATE GALLERY v DUFFY CONSTRUCTION LTD (NO 2)
Insurance (property) – Subrogation – Co-insurance –
Owners and contractors co-insured under policy providing cover against flood –
Works flooded due to alleged negligence of contractors – Policy containing
reasonable care clause – Whether contractors in breach of reasonable care
clause – Whether insurers entitled to exercise subrogation rights.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 42
ENCIA REMEDIATIONS LTD v CANOPIUS MANAGING AGENTS LTD
Insurance (professional indemnity) – Policy covering
professional indemnity risks but excluding supply and construction risks –
Assured entering into design and build contract – Whether policy covered
professional liability arising under that contract – Principles of construction.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 43
PHILLIPS & CO v WHATLEY
Insurance (employers’ liability) – Employee injured in
accident at work – Employee’s lawyers failed to bring action against the
employers within the limitation period – Measure of damages against lawyers –
Prospects of employee recovering damages from employers – Prospects of
employers successfully recovering from their liability insurers.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 44
AXA INSURANCE UK PLC v NORWICH UNION INSURANCE LTD
Insurance (motor) – Employee injured while working on
elevated platform on vehicle belonging to employer – Employer insured against
third party motor liability and against employers’ liability – Whether risk
covered by motor or employers’ policy – Road Traffic Act 1988, section 145 –
Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 – EC Third Motor Insurance
Directive, Council Directive 90/232/EEC.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 45
UNITED INSURANCE CO OF LIBYA v AON LTD
Reinsurance
(broker) – Reinsurance of fronting company – Whether broker misstated to
fronting company the level of commission to be earned on placing reinsurance –
Whether broker contractually bound to fronting company not to tender for
business using another fronting company.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 46
KOREA NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION v ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALITY AG
Reinsurance – Summary judgment – Whether judgment
against reinsurers in Korea
binding – Whether reinsurers had entered into settlement agreement with
reinsured.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 47
SEELE AUSTRIA GMBH & CO v TOKIO MARINE EUROPE INSURANCE LTD
Insurance – Product liability – Insurance against
damage caused by defects in property – Exclusion for damage deliberately
inflicted to remedy a defect – Windows defective and leaked – Whether property
damaged – Whether cost of removing cladding to repair windows recoverable under
policy.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 48
HLB KIDSONS v LLOYD’S UNDERWRITERS SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY 621/PKID00101 & OTHERS
Insurance (professional indemnity) – Policies requiring
assured to give notice in writing as soon as practicable of any circumstances of
which it became aware – Claims made against assured outside policy period – Whether
assured became aware of circumstances – Whether valid notification given to insurers
– Whether clause constituted a condition precedent to the insurers’ liability.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 49
COLONIAL FIRE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v HARRY
Insurance (motor) – Trinidad and Tobago – Claimant
bringing personal injury action against owner, driver and insurers of motor
vehicle – Insurers commencing action to avoid policy – Whether claimant given
notice of insurers’ action – Whether insurers required to join driver to action
– Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 50
GOVERNOR AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OF SCOTLAND v EUCLIDIAN (NO 1) LTD
Insurance (after the event) – Bank lending money to
claimants to fund premium for ATE insurance
– Binding authority issued by underwriters to operator of scheme for issue of
certificates of insurance to claimants – Policies assigned to bank – Whether bank
entitled to recover from ATE insurers where
underwriters not liable to indemnify claimants – Whether clause a “security” –
Whether cancellation of loan agreements “affected” the insurance – Consumer
Credit Act 1974, section 113.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 51
POOLE v HM TREASURY
Insurance
– Lloyd’s – Action by Lloyd’s Names against Treasury for failing to implement
EC Insurance Directives – Whether Directives conferring individual rights –
Council Directive 73/239/EEC.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 52
BUNNEY v BURNS ANDERSON PLC AND ANOTHER CAHILL v TIMOTHY JAMES & PARTNERS LTD
Financial Ombudsman Service – Order by FOS that
defendant pay £228,055 to the applicant for loss caused by unsuitable advice –
Whether court had jurisdiction to hear a challenge to the award other than by
judicial review – Whether FOS had jurisdiction to award more than £100,000 –
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 53
OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS LTD v AXA GLOBAL RISKS (UK) LTD AND OTHERS
Insurance (property) – Steelworks insured against loss
of or damage to property – Exclusion for loss arising from radiation –
Radioactive Contamination cover extending cover to damage due to contamination
– Assured incurring additional costs in disposing of contaminated slag –
Whether costs covered by Radioactive Contamination clause
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 54
HARCOURT v F E F GRIFFIN
Insurance
(liability) – Procedure – Claimant injured on defendant’s premises – Claimant
obtaining consent order on liability and pursuing claim on quantum –
Application by claimant for disclosure of defendant’s liability insurance
details – Whether order should be made – Civil Procedure Rules, Part 18.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 55
EUROP ASSISTANCE INSURANCE LTD v TEMPLE LEGAL PROTECTION LTD
Insurance (after the event) – Agency – Defendant
authorised to conduct run-off on behalf of claimant – Claimant terminating
agency alleging breach of contract and breach of duty – Whether claimant
entitled to temporary injunction restraining defendant from conducting run-off.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 56
BEE v JENSON (NO 2)
Insurance (motor) – Subrogation – Assured’s vehicle
damaged by third party – Assured’s insurers paying for cost of hiring
replacement vehicle – Insurers seeking to recover sum paid from third party –
Whether amount recoverable to be reduced by benefits received by insurers.
[2007] Lloyd's Rep IR Plus 57