Building Law Monthly
MULTIPLE ADJUDICATIONS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME
Quietfield Ltd v Vascroft Contractors Ltd [2006] EWHC 174 (TCC), 2 February 2006
In
Quietfield Ltd v Vascroft Contractors Ltd
[2006] EWHC 174 (TCC), 2 February 2006, Mr Justice Jackson dismissed an application for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s
decision on the ground that the adjudicator had failed to comply with the rules of natural justice. The adjudicator did not
consider the defendant’s submission that it was entitled to an extension of time because he had previously held in another
adjudication that the defendant was not entitled to an extension of time. However, the grounds on which the defendant claimed
that it was entitled to an extension of time in this adjudication differed in significant respects from those advanced in
the earlier adjudication and so the adjudicator ought to have considered them. In reaching his decision Mr Justice Jackson
helpfully set out the principles to be applied when deciding whether multiple adjudications concerning extensions of time
are permissible. In essence he concluded that multiple adjudications are permissible provided that each adjudication arises
from a separate dispute.