i-law

Building Law Monthly

INABILITY OF ADJUDICATOR TO ACT MUST BE COMMUNICATED TO BOTH PARTIES

IDE Contracting Ltd v RG Carter Cambridge Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 224 (Jan)

In IDE Contracting Ltd v RG Carter Cambridge Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 224 (Jan) Judge Havery QC held that it was implicit in paragraph 2 of the Schedule to the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998 (SI 1998, No. 649) that the inability of a chosen adjudicator to act must be indicated to all parties before the step is taken by one party of inviting a substitute to assume the role of adjudicator. On the facts of the case the claimants alone had been in contact with the nominated adjudicator and had then communicated to the defendants the inability of the adjudicator to act. It was held that the defendants were entitled to object to the appointment of the substitute adjudicator and, given that they had not agreed to be bound by the ruling of the substitute adjudicator on the issue of his jurisdiction, the award of the adjudicator could not stand.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.