i-law

Building Law Monthly

PRESENTATION AND ENCASHMENT OF CHEQUE HELD TO AMOUNT TO ACCORD

Bracken v Billinghurst [2003] EWHC 1333 (TCC); [2003] All ER (D) 488 (July)

In Bracken v Billinghurst [2003] EWHC 1333 (TCC); [2003] All ER (D) 488 (July) Judge David Wilcox held that the claimants had agreed to compromise their claim against the defendant when they presented and cashed the defendant’s cheque which had been sent in ‘full and final settlement’ of all issues between the parties. While cashing a cheque is not conclusive evidence that the terms proposed by the party sending the cheque have been accepted, it is strong evidence of assent by the creditor. This being the case, a creditor who is minded to cash a cheque but does not wish to accept the terms on which the cheque has been sent by the debtor, must make it clear to the debtor that he is not assenting to the terms proposed by the debtor before he cashes the cheque.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.