Construction Law Reporter
RBH BUILDING CONTRACTORS LTD v JAMES AND ANOTHER
[2026] EWCA Civ 511, Court of Appeal Civil Division, King, Coulson and Males LJJ, 29 April 2026
Adjudication – Residential occupier exclusion – Validity of pay less notice
Two issues were raised in this appeal to the Court of Appeal. The first was whether the Deputy Judge had erred in law in concluding
that the defendants were not residential occupiers within the meaning of section 106 of the Housing Grants, Construction and
Regeneration Act 1996. The second was whether the Deputy Judge had erred in concluding that the defendants had issued a valid
pay less notice. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on both grounds and in doing so set out a number of principles to
be applied when deciding whether or not the residential occupier exception is applicable and in considering whether a payment
notice or a pay less notice is valid.