i-law

Law and Practice of Maritime Liens, The

The Law and Practice of Maritime Liens, 1st Edition, (c) 2025

Chapter 3


Page 25

Damage maritime lien

3.1 Early law

From very early times Admiralty was restricted to things done upon the seas by the statutes of Richard II in the years 1389 and 1391. But they still enabled a wide range of matters to fall within the jurisdiction. 1 Blackstone wrote that Admiralty had “jurisdiction and power to try and determine all maritime causes…committed on the high seas, out of the reach of our ordinary courts of justice”. Such causes he said are remedied “in a peculiar court of their own”. 2 As to things other than contracts, John Godolphin 3 wrote in 1661 that “the Jurisdiction of the Admiralty is limited as to the Locality upon or beyond the Sea”. As to cases of damage occurring at sea Dr Brown 4 was clear that for such damage “remedy may be had in the admiralty, but not if it happens within the body of a county”. The cases which frequently arose in admiralty he said were those of “collision, or ships running foul of one another, by which one or both are sunk or battered”. At the same time, however, he expressed the view that no lien arose in such cases: “The torts of the master cannot be supposed to hypothecate the ship; nor, in my humble judgment, in strictness of speech, to produce any lien on it”. 5

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.