Personal Injury Compensation
Appeal from EAT concerning “human trafficking” and slavery
Basfar v Wong  UKSC 20
The Supreme Court has issued judgment a case in which a migrant domestic employee who worked in the home of a Saudi Arabian
diplomat in the UK sought compensation for unpaid wages and breaches of employment rights. This complex judgment, which involves
a defence of diplomatic immunity and art 31 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 (the “Diplomatic Convention”),
incorporated into UK domestic law by the Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964, will be summarised in brief. Although the decision
of the court favoured Ms Wong, unless admissions are made she will be required to prove the facts that she alleged before
an employment tribunal, and even if her claim is eventually successful, and a money judgment is issued against the appellant
it will probably be difficult, if not practically impossible, to enforce. The reason for that is that as long as a diplomat
remains in post, art 31(3) of the Convention precludes the taking of any measures to execute the judgment which would infringe
the inviolability of the diplomat’s person or residence. After the diplomat’s posting ends and he leaves the country, there
might be no realistic prospect of enforcing a judgment against him in his home state.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.
If you are already a subscriber, click login button.Login