We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

A v B (THE “TAI HUNTER”)

Lloyd's Law Reports

A v B (THE “TAI HUNTER”)

[2022] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 65

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION((COMMERCIAL COURT))

Before Mr Justice Henshaw

Sale of goods (fob) – Sale of Ukrainian feed corn – Buyers making invalid nomination of vessel – Sellers purporting to terminate contract – Whether false nomination was breach of condition – Whether nominated vessel had to have been already chartered by buyers – Whether buyers’ obligation to provide copy of charterparty was a condition – Arbitration – Serious irregularity – Whether GAFTA Board of Appeal failed to consider various matters – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 and 69.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click login button.

Login