This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Contracts – Contracts of affreightment – Procedure – Permission to amend particulars of claim
In this litigation, the defendant Litasco, a subsidiary of the Russian oil company Lukoil, had applied for summary judgment following the judge’s decision that the basis on which the claimant Palmali had quantified its claim for damages of US$1.9 billion was not seriously arguable. In the original claim, Palmali had failed to distinguish between losses attributable to “own fleet” and “third party” vessels, treating all vessels owned by the group of companies or bareboat chartered in as a single entity for the purposes of the alleged breach of the contract of affreightment. The claimant applied for permission further to amend its Particulars of Claim in which it sought damages of now US$151 million under what it contended was a long-term contract of affreightment with the defendant.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.