We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close


Lloyd's Law Reporter


[2021] EWHC 1161 (Comm), Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, Mr Justice Foxton, 6 May 2021

Contracts – Contracts of affreightment – Procedure – Permission to amend particulars of claim

In this litigation, the defendant Litasco, a subsidiary of the Russian oil company Lukoil, had applied for summary judgment following the judge’s decision that the basis on which the claimant Palmali had quantified its claim for damages of US$1.9 billion was not seriously arguable. In the original claim, Palmali had failed to distinguish between losses attributable to “own fleet” and “third party” vessels, treating all vessels owned by the group of companies or bareboat chartered in as a single entity for the purposes of the alleged breach of the contract of affreightment. The claimant applied for permission further to amend its Particulars of Claim in which it sought damages of now US$151 million under what it contended was a long-term contract of affreightment with the defendant.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more