Law applicable to an arbitration agreement: significance of the seat
In BNA v BNB and Another  SGCA 84 the Singapore Court of Appeal was required to determine whether a Singapore arbitration tribunal had jurisdiction over a dispute under a contract governed by the law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) but subject to an arbitration clause specifying arbitration in Shanghai under the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.
The question was whether the arbitration agreement was governed by the law of the PRC or the law of Singapore, thereby posing
the familiar question of whether the law of the main agreement or the law of the seat is of the greater significance.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.