i-law

Lloyd's Law Reporter

APEX ENERGY INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD V WANXIANG RESOURCES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD

[2020] SGHC 138, High Court of Singapore, Hoo Sheau Peng J, 6 July 2020

Contract – Formation – Offer and acceptance – Breach – Duty of reasonable mitigation – Quantum – Effect of hedging arrangement

Apex contended and Wanxiang denied that the parties had entered into a contract for the sale of a cargo of light cycle oil. There had been a deal recap on 23 November 2017 and further communications thereafter. Once the transaction had fallen through, Apex had sold the cargo to another buyer. The question arose whether, if there was a contract and a breach, this was a reasonable mitigation. Wanxiang argued that Apex had not proven that the sale was made on an available market price. Apex argued that there was no available market because of price uncertainty at the time and difficulties in selling the cargo so that section 50(3) of the Sale of Goods Act (Cap 393, 1999 Rev Ed) did not apply. Wanxiang also contended that a hedging arrangement entered into by Apex was unreasonable.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.