In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

COMPANY 1 v COMPANY 2 AND ANOTHER

Lloyd's Law Reports

COMPANY 1 v COMPANY 2 AND ANOTHER

[2018] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 115

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION((LEEDS DISTRICT REGISTRY))

Before His Honour Judge Saffman

Arbitration – Interim relief – Order preserving evidence or assets – Whether matter urgent – Whether court should intervene where arbitration had its seat in Switzerland – Arbitration Act 1996, sections 2(3) and 44(3).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more