Online Arbitration
Page 195
Index
Index
- AAA 1.2–3.3, 2.1.2
- AAA–Cybersettle Strategic Alliance 4.2
- AAA WebFile 3.2
- ABA 1.2–3.3
- accessibility 2.1.8.3
- accessibility of online arbitration platforms 4.6
- accountability 2.1.8.2
- accreditation 2.1.8.4
- advanced technologies 4.1
- alternative dispute resolution
- popularity of 1.1.2
- Amazon
- notice and takedown procedures 4.2
- applicable law 6.2
- appointment of online arbitrators 4.3
- arbitral awards 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.2.3.2, 1.2.3.4, 2.1.8.1, 2.1.8.6, 3.4, 3.8, 4.3, 4.7, 5.1.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2
- arbitration agreements 3.6
- China 5.1.2
- dispute resolution clause 3.6
- electronic contracts, as 5.1.1
- EU Directives 5.1.2
- format 3.6
- generating 3.6
- incorporation via electronic means 5.1.2
- meaning 5.1.1
- online, validity of 5.1
- reasonableness and fairness test 5.1.2
- recognised in writing 5.1.1
- recognised methods of incorporation 5.1.2
- recognition of forming 5.1.1
- separability 5.1.2
- submitting 3.6
- technological measures of agreeing 5.1.2
- UK legislation 5.1.2
- unconscionableness test 5.1.2
- US legislation 5.1.2
- Arbitrator Intelligence 4.3
- artificial intelligence 4.6
- artificial intelligence technologies 4.1
- authority 4.2
- automated alert 6.4, 7.2
- automated clause 4.7, 7.2
- automated computing 3.1, 4.1, 4.6
- automated decision 4.2, 4.8
- automated ethnical checking system 3.4
- case–based reasoning 4.6
- challenge of awards 6.3
- Chinese approach 1.2.3.4
- choice of procedure rules 3.3
- choice of service provider 3.2
- CIETAC 2.1.4, 2.1.7
- CIETAC Online Arbitration Rules 3.1, 3.2
- cloud computing 3.1, 3.2
- commencement of arbitration proceedings 3.7
- commercial arbitration agreements 5.3
- confidentiality 2.1.8.2
- consent awards 6.1
- consumer arbitration agreements 5.2
- contracts of adhesion 5.3
- cooperation agreements 4.2
- credibility 2.1.8.4
- Cybersettle 2.1.2
- dispute resolution
- traditional means 1.1.1
- disputing parties 4.1
- domain names
- online arbitration 1.2.1
- due process 6.4
- durable medium 4.4
- eBay 2.1.1
- efficiency 2.1.8.1
- electronic evidence 3.5, 4.4
- electronic mediation agreement 2.1.8.6
- electronic records 1.2.1, 2.1.8.1, 2.1.8.5, 2.1.8.6, 4.4, 7.2
- electronic seal 4.4
- electronic signature 4.4
- enforceability 2.1.8.6
- enforcement of online arbitral awards 6.1–6.4
- eQuibbly 3.2
- ethics of online arbitrators 3.4
- EU framework 1.2.3.2
- EU ODR Regulation 3.1
- EU single ODR portal 3.1
- European Small Claims Procedure 3.1
- evidence, format of 3.5
- evidentiary hearing 3.5
- expansion of general ODR systems 4.1
- expert determination 3.5
- expert systems 4.6
- expert witnesses 3.5
- expertise 4.2
- future legislative trends 7.1
- general regulations
- further development 3.1
- ICANN 2.1.3
- impartiality of arbitrators 3.4
- institutional arbitration rules 3.3
- integrity of online arbitration platforms 4.6
- intelligent/ advanced ODR 4.6
- international harmonisation 1.2.3.4
- international harmonised best practices 7.1, 7.2
- international procedural rules 3.3
- international regulatory development 1.2.3.1
- internet–related disputes
- unique characteristics 7.1
- internet–related issues
- online arbitration, and 1.2.1
- jurisdiction 6.2
- legal framework for online arbitral awards 6.1
- legal seat of arbitration 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2
- legislative measures 1.2.3
- machine learning 4.6
- mediation
-
mediation agreements 2.1.8.6, 3.6, 4.7Page 197
- mediation settlement agreements 2.1.8.6
- Modria 2.1.6
- MSODR 2.1.6
- negotiation 1.1.2, 1.2.3.1, 1.2.3.3, 2.1.2, 2.1.5, 2.1.8.6, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.6
- New York Convention 1.2.3.4, 2.1
- notice and takedown procedures 4.2
- online arbitral awards 3.8
- online arbitration
- online arbitration rules
- text Appendix II
- Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)
- advent of 1.1.3
- concepts of 1.1
- definition 1.1.3
- enforceability, principle of 2.1.7
- harmonisation 1.1.3
- in rem jurisdiction 1.2.1
- international element 1.2.3.1
- international regulatory development 1.2.3.1
- legal issues 1.2.3.1
- legislative development 1.1.3
- legislative measures 1.2.3
- recent development of services 2.1.6
- technological advancement and constraints 1.2–2
- Technological Notes 1.2.3.1
- technologically neutral definition 1.2.3.1
- UN Working Group 1.2.3.1
- underlying technical principles 1.1.3
- online negotiation 1.1.3, 1.2.3.4, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.6, 2.1.8.4, 3.1, 4.2
- Oregon eCourt 4.1
- party-appointed experts 3.5
- personal IT equipment
- use of 3.2
- pre-agreed procedures 6.4, 7.2
- pre-dispute arbitration agreement 5.2.1
- pre-dispute arbitration clause 5.1.1, 5.2.1, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2
- preliminary hearing 3.7
- private companies 3.2
- procedures 3.1–3.8
- process of hearing 3.7
- public/ statutory small claims arbitration 5.2.2
- Rechtwijzer 2.0 2.1.5
- recognition and enforcement of awards 6.4
- recognition of forming arbitration agreements via electronic communications 5.1.1
- Regulation (EU) No 524/2013
- text Appendix I
- reputation 4.2
- robotic arbitrators 4.8, 7.2
- robotisation of lawyers 4.6
- Russian Online Arbitration Regulation 2.1.7
- seat of online arbitration 4.7
- security 2.1.8.5
- security of online arbitration platforms 4.6
- selection of online arbitrators 3.4
- self–regulated rules 3.3
- service-oriented computing 1.1.3, 4.1, 4.6, 4.8, 5.1.2
- smart ODR systems 4.1
- solutions to obstacles in online arbitration 7.2
- SquareTrade 2.1.1
- strategic alliance 4.2
- systemic legal development 4.1–4.8
- systemic technological development 4.1–4.8
- Technological Notes 1.2.3.1
- time stamp 2.1.8.4, 3.2, 3.4, 6.4, 7.2
- training for users 4.8
- transparency 2.1.8.2
-
trust 4.2Page 198
- trust service 3.2
- trustwork schemes 3.2
- UK Bar Council guidelines 3.2
- UNCITRAL Draft ODR Procedural Rules 3.1
- US trend 1.2.3.3
- users’ awareness 4.8
- users’ protection 4.8
- Youstice 2.1.6