In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

Stay of judicial proceedings: "inoperative or incapable of being performed"

Arbitration Law Monthly

Stay of judicial proceedings: "inoperative or incapable of being performed"

In Cranium Adspace Ltd v British American Tobacco (New Zealand) Ltd [2016] NZHC 2922 Edwards J in the High Court of New Zealand has rejected the argument that an arbitration clause was inoperative or incapable of being performed simply because a third party had become involved in the dispute.

Cranium: the facts On 15 May 2014 the parties entered into an agreement under which Cranium agreed to sell advertising space on BATNZ’s tobacco dispensing units. Clause 15 was a dispute resolution clause.

The rest of this document is only available to online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more