The meaning of “arbitration agreement”: unilateral and optional clauses
The obligation of a Singapore court to stay its proceedings where there is a valid and applicable arbitration clause, under section 6 of the International Arbitration Act, is for all relevant purposes identical to the duty of the English court under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996. In each case, a stay can be refused only if there is no arbitration agreement or if the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.
In Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
 SGHC 238 Vinodh Coomaraswamy J considered the question whether, for stay purposes, a clause whereby one party alone
had the right to determine whether or not there should be a reference to arbitration amounted to an arbitration agreement
even though the election to arbitrate had not been exercised. The decision was upheld in a relatively brief decision by the
Singapore Court of Appeal
 SGCA 32, albeit on rather different grounds.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.