In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

High Court recasts scope of consequential loss

Litigation Letter

High Court recasts scope of consequential loss

Star Polaris LLC v HHIC-Phil Inc [2016] EWHC 2941 (Comm), 17 November 2016

It will be remembered that Lord Hoffmann in Caledonia North Sea v British Telecommunications [2002] UKHL 4 doubted obiter whether the Court of Appeal decisions equating “consequential loss” in exclusion clauses to the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale were correct. In this recent appeal from an arbitration award, the Commercial Court revisited this precise question.

The rest of this document is only available to online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more