This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Supreme Court rewrites test for illegality defence
Patel v Mirza  2 Lloyd’s Rep 130,  UKSC 42, 20 July 2016
The Supreme Court rewrote the test for the illegality defence (ex turpi causa) in this important decision. Mr Patel transferred
£620,000 to Mr Mirza for the purpose of betting on the price of RBS shares, using advance insider information which Mr Mirza
expected to obtain. Mr Mirza’s expectation proved to be mistaken, and Mr Patel sought to recover the sums paid to Mr Mirza
on the grounds of contract and unjust enrichment. The High Court rejected the claim on the basis that the transaction amounted
to the offence of insider dealing and was tainted by illegality. The Court of Appeal, however, reversed the trial judge’s
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.