In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

Supreme Court rewrites test for illegality defence

Litigation Letter

Supreme Court rewrites test for illegality defence

Patel v Mirza [2016] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 130, [2016] UKSC 42, 20 July 2016

The Supreme Court rewrote the test for the illegality defence (ex turpi causa) in this important decision. Mr Patel transferred £620,000 to Mr Mirza for the purpose of betting on the price of RBS shares, using advance insider information which Mr Mirza expected to obtain. Mr Mirza’s expectation proved to be mistaken, and Mr Patel sought to recover the sums paid to Mr Mirza on the grounds of contract and unjust enrichment. The High Court rejected the claim on the basis that the transaction amounted to the offence of insider dealing and was tainted by illegality. The Court of Appeal, however, reversed the trial judge’s decision.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more