In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

High Court adopts literal interpretation of development agreement

Litigation Letter

High Court adopts literal interpretation of development agreement

Dooba Developments Ltd v McLagan Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 2944 (Ch), 23 November 2016

Asda (through its subsidiary McLagan) entered into a conditional development agreement with Dooba in July 2010. Asda intended that Dooba would build a superstore on the site in question. The agreement would take effect upon meeting four conditions: (1) obtaining satisfactory planning permission; (2) entering into a satisfactory s106 agreement; (3) acquisition of additional land and necessary consents for rebuilding the access to the site; (4) comply with outstanding conditions on an existing outline planning permission. Importantly, the agreement provided that “if all of the conditions have not been discharged […] by the Longstop Date then either Asda or Dooba may rescind this Agreement”.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more