In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

Commercial Court interprets limitation in Hague Rules

Litigation Letter

Commercial Court interprets limitation in Hague Rules

Vinnlustodin HF and Another v Sea Tank Shipping AS (The “Aquasia”) [2016] 1 Lloyd’s Law Rep Plus 75, [2016] EWHC 2514 (Comm), 14 October 2016

This was a dispute between the claimant owners/insurers of the cargo and defendant shipowner of the vessel known as the “Aquasia”. The vessel was carrying fishoil, and on arrival at the discharge port, about 547 mt of the cargo was found to have suffered damage. The shipowner accepted liability, but contended that it was entitled to a limitation of its liability to £54,730.90 i.e. £100 per mt of cargo damaged, pursuant to article IV rule 5 of the Hague Rules (limitation of liability to £100 “per package or unit”) which was scheduled to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924.

The rest of this document is only available to online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more