We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Supreme Court rules on unlawfulness of bedroom tax

Litigation Letter

Supreme Court rules on unlawfulness of bedroom tax

R (on the application of Rutherford and another) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58, 9 November 2016

The Carmichael case concerned Mrs Carmichael, who had spina bifida and needed a separate bedroom with a special hospital-type bed. Lord Toulson noted that this was analogous to the case of Gorry v Wiltshire County Council in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629, in which the Court previously held that Regulation B13 discriminated against two children of the same sex who could not share a bedroom due to severe disabilities. His Lordship could not “ see a sensible reason for distinguishing between adult partners who cannot share a bedroom because of disability and children who cannot do so because of disability” , and held that there was no reasonable justification for the difference of treatment (paragraph 46).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more