i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE IN CONTRACT—AGAIN

Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v. Butcher
Traditionally, the absence of any defence of contributory negligence in the law of contract has been seen as highlighting one of the essential differences between contractual and tortious obligations. As Judge Newey, Q.C., pointed out, in Basildon D.C. v. J.E. Lesser (Properties) Ltd. 1, blameworthiness is generally irrelevant in contract. This position has been the subject of challenge, notably in Sayers v. Harlow U.D.C. 2 and De Meza and Stuart v. Apple, Van Straten, Shena and Stone 3, but the recent decisions in Basildon and in A.B. Marintrans v. Comet Shipping Co. Ltd. 4, that the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 does not apply to contractual claims, indicated a return to orthodoxy.

10

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.