Lloyd's Law Reporter
ALPINA RIVER CRUISES GMBH AND ANOTHER V MINISTERO DELLE INFRASTRUTTURE E DEI TRASPORTI - CAPITANERIA DI PORTO DI CHIOGGIA
[2013] Case C-17/13, Court of Justice of the European Union, 27 March 2014
Maritime transport - Concept of cabotage - Passenger traffic - Cruise traffic - Passengers departing from and returning to the same port - Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within member states (maritime cabotage)
This was a request for a preliminary ruling from the
Consiglio di Stato of Italy. The background to the dispute was that an
application by the claimant Swiss and German cruise companies had been rejected
by the Italian authorities. The application concerned permission for Bellissima, a Swiss-registered vessel
used for river cruises from Venice and Chioggia up the river Po and back to
Venice, to pass through the Italian territorial sea as part of the cruise. The
Italian authorities rejected the application because the Italian Code of
Navigation article 224, with reference to Regulation 3577/92/EEC, restricted
maritime cabotage to ships flying the flag of a member state. Following litigation
before the administrative tribunals, the highest instance Consiglio di Stato
had referred a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union, namely
whether Regulation 3577/92/EEC on maritime cabotage was applicable to cruises
between ports in a member state without boarding or debarkation of passengers
at those ports, because the passengers always left the vessel in the same port
where they boarded in the member state. The Advocate General proposed a ruling
that a transport service such as that in the present case constituted maritime
transport within a member state within the meaning of article 2(1) of
Regulation 3577/92/EEC.