Lloyd's Law Reporter
NEWLAND SHIPPING AND FORWARDING LTD V TOBA TRADING FZC
[2014] EWHC 661 (Comm), Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, Mr Justice Leggatt, 12 March 2014
Sale of goods - Sums advanced under previous contracts - Sale contract providing for discount as means of repayment - Sale contract terminated - Whether unjust enrichment
The claimant, Newland, had sold two cargoes of gasoil and
gasoline to the defendant, Toba, for which substantial advance payments were
made but which were never shipped. New contracts were concluded under which
Newland undertook to deduct 20 per cent from the purchase price to give credit
for the advances. One of these, the contract at issue, was dated 17 March 2011
and was for the sale of 5,000mt +/- 10 per cent in seller's option of hydropurified
gasoil to be delivered CPT Serkhetabad Station, Turkmenistan. This contract was
terminated by Newland in April 2011 on the ground that payment had not been
made within two banking days of the final price being established, as required
by clause 7. In this action Newland claimed sums said to be payable by Toba
upon the termination of the contract after Toba failed to pay for goods which
had been shipped. Toba denied that there had been a valid termination and that
any of the sums claims were recoverable. It counterclaimed for restitution of
the advance payments to which Newland argued that any rights under the first
contracts had been replaced by rights under the subsequent contracts.