LLR: Financial Crime

General Editors: Karl Laird and Sebastian Walker</br> Editorial Advisory Board:</br> Professor Peter Alldridge</br> Professor Jeremy Horder</br> Professor David Ormerod KC</br> Professor John R Spencer</br> Richard Burger</br> William Clegg KC</br> Colin Nicholls KC</br> Jonathan Pickworth </br> Nicholas Purnell KC</br> Case reporters and commentators:</br> Academic:</br> </br> Practitioner:</br> Allison Clare KC</br> Sarah Clarke KC</br> Anita Clifford</br>Susannah Cogman</br> Rachel Cook</br> Alex Davidson </br>Eleanor Davison</br> Adina Ezekiel</br> Elaine Freer</br> William Hays</br> Bryan Heaney</br> Nichola Higgins</br> Shula de Jersey</br> Paul Jarvis</br> Nicholas Johnson KC</br> Alice Lepeuple</br> Robin Loof</br>Jennifer Newcomb</br> Quinton Newcomb</br>James Purchas</br> Andrew Smith</br> Aaron Watkins</br> Sebastian Walker</br> Gabriele Watts</br>

Document

SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY v AZAM

[2013] Lloyd's Rep FC 513

COURT OF APPEAL(CIVIL DIVISION)

Before Lord Justice LLOYD,Lord Justice MOORE-BICK,Lord Justice MCFARLANE

Civil recovery – Property freezing order – Variation of property freezing order to allow payment of legal expenses – Whether court could be satisfied that the respondent had other property from which he could meet legal expenses – Burden of proof – Inference that the respondent had substantial undisclosed resources – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, sections 233(1), 245A and 245C – Civil Recovery Proceedings Practice Direction, para 5B.1.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.