LLR: Financial Crime

General Editors: Karl Laird and Sebastian Walker</br> Editorial Advisory Board:</br> Professor Peter Alldridge</br> Professor Jeremy Horder</br> Professor David Ormerod KC</br> Professor John R Spencer</br> Richard Burger</br> William Clegg KC</br> Colin Nicholls KC</br> Jonathan Pickworth </br> Nicholas Purnell KC</br> Case reporters and commentators:</br> Academic:</br> </br> Practitioner:</br> Allison Clare KC</br> Sarah Clarke KC</br> Anita Clifford</br>Susannah Cogman</br> Rachel Cook</br> Alex Davidson </br>Eleanor Davison</br> Adina Ezekiel</br> Elaine Freer</br> William Hays</br> Bryan Heaney</br> Nichola Higgins</br> Shula de Jersey</br> Paul Jarvis</br> Nicholas Johnson KC</br> Alice Lepeuple</br> Robin Loof</br>Jennifer Newcomb</br> Quinton Newcomb</br>James Purchas</br> Andrew Smith</br> Aaron Watkins</br> Sebastian Walker</br> Gabriele Watts</br>

Document

SHAH AND ANOTHER v HSBC PRIVATE BANK (UK) LTD (NO 3)

[2012] Lloyd's Rep FC 507

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION

Mr Justice Supperstone

Money laundering — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“POCA”), sections 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 333, 335, 336, 337, 338, 340, 342 — Effect of POCA on bank’s relationship with its customer — Honest and genuine suspicion — Appropriate consent — Suspicious Activity Reports (“SARs”) — Nominated officer — Disclosure of SARs to customer — Tipping-off — Prejudicing an investigation.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.