LLR: Financial Crime

General Editors: Karl Laird and Sebastian Walker</br> Editorial Advisory Board:</br> Professor Peter Alldridge</br> Professor Jeremy Horder</br> Professor David Ormerod KC</br> Professor John R Spencer</br> Richard Burger</br> William Clegg KC</br> Colin Nicholls KC</br> Jonathan Pickworth </br> Nicholas Purnell KC</br> Case reporters and commentators:</br> Academic:</br> </br> Practitioner:</br> Allison Clare KC</br> Sarah Clarke KC</br> Anita Clifford</br>Susannah Cogman</br> Rachel Cook</br> Alex Davidson </br>Eleanor Davison</br> Adina Ezekiel</br> Elaine Freer</br> William Hays</br> Bryan Heaney</br> Nichola Higgins</br> Shula de Jersey</br> Paul Jarvis</br> Nicholas Johnson KC</br> Alice Lepeuple</br> Robin Loof</br>Jennifer Newcomb</br> Quinton Newcomb</br>James Purchas</br> Andrew Smith</br> Aaron Watkins</br> Sebastian Walker</br> Gabriele Watts</br>

Document

BHANDAL v HER MAJESTY’S REVENUE & CUSTOMS

[2012] Lloyd's Rep FC 127

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (ADMINISTRATIVE COURT)

Mr Justice Hickinbottom

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — Restraint order — Criminal Justice Act 1988, section 89 — Compensation — Limitation periods — Extension of time limit for application for compensation — Discretion of court to extend time limit — Whether application an abuse of process — Whether a discrete section 89 claim possible — Restraint proceedings remaining live for purposes of section 89.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.