i-law

Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter

Linsen International Ltd and Ors v Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd and Ors - QBD (Comm Ct)(Flaux J) - 14 September 2011

Practice - Freezing injunction – Piercing of corporate veil - Whether corporate abuse - Whether veil could be pierced so as to make certain defendants liable under underlying charterparties and guarantees - Whether injunction should be continued

The claimants were all companies in the “Empire” group. In 2007 Empire entered negotiations with various shipyards for the construction of 12 chemical tankers for delivery between December 2008 and early 2011. Seven of the tankers were to be chartered to companies in the “Humpuss” group. The claimants were the owners of four of those vessels and entered time charterparties to charter their vessels, when built, to the first defendant. In the case of at least two of the charterparties, the first defendant’s obligations were guaranteed by the second defendant.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.