i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

THE FORCE BE WITH EU? INFRINGEMENTS OF US COPYRIGHT IN THE ENGLISH COURTS

Lucasfilm v. Ainsworth

On any view, the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lucasfilm Ltd v. Ainsworth 1 is remarkable. For those, such as the present author, whose memories of growing up are marked by visits to the cinema to see the early Star Wars films, the case provides an interesting insight into the creative processes that led to on-screen success. For intellectual property lawyers, the court’s judgment contains a detailed (but largely otiose) account of the development of copyright and design protection for sculptures. For private international lawyers, the judgment (1) confirms that the growth of the internet has not impacted on the common law rules for the recognition and enforcement of judgments, and (2), more significantly, asserts that a claim based upon an infringement of a US copyright (or other non-Member State intellectual property right) is not justiciable in England, even if the defendant is domiciled in a Member State of the EU and the Brussels I Regulation2 confers “jurisdiction” on the courts of the United Kingdom. The focus of this note is on the last of these issues, which marks a new front in the battle between the rebellious common law and the growing empire of EU private international law.
Mr Ainsworth, the first defendant and sole director of the second defendant, was a trained engineer with an apparent interest in vacuum-moulding plastics. In 1976, he was asked by a neighbour working on the first Star Wars film3 to produce plastic armour, including a helmet, for the stormtrooper characters. The claimant companies were responsible for the production of the film. As the trial judge, Mann J, recorded:4
“One of the most abiding images in the film was that of the Imperial Stormtroopers. These were soldiers clad in white armour, including a white helmet which left no part of the face uncovered. The [first] defendant (Mr Ainsworth) made that armour for the film in vacuum-moulded plastic. He has recently started selling versions to members of the public, both in the form of a complete set and the helmet alone. That is said to infringe the copyright of the claimants. He also sells replicas of other helmets. These again are said to infringe. He is able to make these things because he made the originals for the film, and has kept the tools or moulds on which they are made. This action seeks to enforce the intellectual property rights of the claimants. It is based on copyright infringement and


LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY

182

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.