LLR: Financial Crime

General Editors: Karl Laird and Sebastian Walker</br> Editorial Advisory Board:</br> Professor Peter Alldridge</br> Professor Jeremy Horder</br> Professor David Ormerod KC</br> Professor John R Spencer</br> Richard Burger</br> William Clegg KC</br> Colin Nicholls KC</br> Jonathan Pickworth </br> Nicholas Purnell KC</br> Case reporters and commentators:</br> Academic:</br> </br> Practitioner:</br> Allison Clare KC</br> Sarah Clarke KC</br> Anita Clifford</br>Susannah Cogman</br> Rachel Cook</br> Alex Davidson </br>Eleanor Davison</br> Adina Ezekiel</br> Elaine Freer</br> William Hays</br> Bryan Heaney</br> Nichola Higgins</br> Shula de Jersey</br> Paul Jarvis</br> Nicholas Johnson KC</br> Alice Lepeuple</br> Robin Loof</br>Jennifer Newcomb</br> Quinton Newcomb</br>James Purchas</br> Andrew Smith</br> Aaron Watkins</br> Sebastian Walker</br> Gabriele Watts</br>

Document

GILHAM v R

[2010] Lloyd's Rep FC 89

COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION)

Before Lord Justice Stanley Burnton, Mr Justice Penry-Davey, Mrs Justice Sharp

Copyright — Criminal law — Selling a device designed for the purpose of circumventing effective technological measures — Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 16(3)(A) — Meaning of “substantial part of a copyright work” — Less than 3 per cent of relevant data copied at any one time — Upholding conviction on different basis.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.