We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

CHAPTER 5 RULES AND DOCTRINES RESTRICTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMIRALTY COURT TO ADJUDICATE ON THE MERITS OF A CASE

Modern Maritime Law and Risk Management

CHAPTER 5 RULES AND DOCTRINES RESTRICTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMIRALTY COURT TO ADJUDICATE ON THE MERITS OF A CASE 1 INTRODUCTION Although the jurisdiction of the Admiralty Court is very wide ( see Chapter 1 ), there are some limits and restrictions which the court will consider in exercising its discretion to determine its own jurisdiction. For example, as mentioned in Chapter 1 , para 7, the jurisdiction of the Admiralty Court cannot be assumed in circumstances provided by the Crown Immunity Act 1947 and the State Immunity Act 1978. Convention rules or other doctrines also restrict the scope of exercising or maintaining jurisdiction on the merits of a case, as will be seen in this and in the following chapters. On the other hand, the court may, by an anti-suit injunction, restrain a litigant from continuing proceedings commenced in a foreign court if there are grounds for protecting rights, or asserting its own jurisdiction ( see Chapter 7 ).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more