We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Contested will

Litigation Letter

Contested will

David Robert Perrins v (1) Richard Philip Holland (as executor of the estate of Robert Merrins, deceased) (2) Sharon Ruth Moore (as executor of the estate of Robert Perrins, deceased) (3) Anne Dooney [2009] EWHC 2558 (Ch) Ch D (Birmingham) 21 October

The claimant had unsuccessfully challenged the validity of the deceased’s will which had left his estate to his carer, the defendant. After commencement of the probate and inheritance proceedings, the defendant had offered to settle. The claimant did not accept that offer. Following judgment, the claimant argued that he could demonstrate a positive case for not merely exonerating him from having to pay any one else’s costs, but for having his own costs paid. The claimant submitted that: (1) the litigation had been induced by uncertainty over the deceased’s testamentary capacity and compounded by the failure of the legal executive with charge of the deceased’s will, to have consulted a medical practitioner about his mental capacity; (2) the uncertainty surrounding the will had been compounded by untruthful or exaggerated evidence provided by the defendant and the legal executive;

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more