We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Substitution of defendants

Litigation Letter

Substitution of defendants

Aventis Pasteur v O’Byrne ECJ C-358/08; SJ 8 December p5

In November 2000, Declan O’Byrne’s parents claimed that the child had suffered severe brain damage after being treated with a vaccine produced by Aventis Pasteur. They sued the pharmaceutical company’s UK subsidiary, but it argued that the correct defendant should be its parent company. The claimants obtained an order for a substitution of defendant but the defendants argued that the claim had by then become time-barred. The Court of Appeal allowed the substitution but the House of Lords referred the matter to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more