Choudhary and others v Bhatter and others  EWCA Civ 1176; TLR 20 November
Article 22 of Council Regulation 44/2001/EC provides,
inter alia : ‘The following courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction regardless of domicile …’ and then identifies certain further criteria.
That direction was not intended to apply to the courts of a member state, for example Denmark, which was not bound by the
regulation; and a fortiori, the direction was not intended to apply as between the courts of member states and the courts
of non-member states. Accordingly, the opening words of art 22 have no application to a case where the person to be sued is
not domiciled in a member state. On the facts of the present case the appropriate venue was India.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.