i-law

Arbitration Law Monthly

Time limits

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Konig v Zwiebel, 1 July 2009, has not been reported, although there are summaries of the case on both Lexis and Lawtel. It appears from those summaries that an important point on the running of time for an appeal has been determined by the Court of Appeal. The full facts are not clear, although they are not necessary for the point in issue to be appreciated.

The background

A dispute between the parties as to the ownership of property was referred to arbitration under Jewish law and before the Beth Din. The arbitrators ruled in favour of the claimants, holding that the property was held in trust for a charity. The defendants asserted that the award had dealt with matters not referred to the arbitrators and requested that the award be revoked. The arbitrators responded by issuing a revised award. That award was not honoured. The claimants applied to the court for an order enforcing the award under s66 of the Arbitration Act 1996, and the defendants appealed against the award on the grounds that the arbitrators had exceeded their jurisdiction. The proceedings were settled by a compromise agreement which was embodied in consent orders, although the second consent order was disputed.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.