Lloyd's Law Reporter
BEE V JENSON
[2007] EWCA Civ 923, Court of Appeal, Tuckey and Longmore LJJ and Sir Paul Kennedy, 13 September 2007
Tortfeasor’s liability – Damage to car – Hire of replacement car – Insurance
Mr Bee’s car had been hit by Mr Jenson and was being repaired. Mr Bee hired a replacement car and sought to recover the cost
of the hire car from Mr Jenson. The cost of hire itself was not in issue, but Mr Jenson sought to deduct from that cost a
discount obtained by Mr Bee’s insurers, who had arranged for the car hire, from the car hire company by way of commercial
inducement. The question was whether Mr Bee could recover from Mr Jenson what was accepted to be a reasonable hire charge
reasonably incurred, or whether Mr Jenson was entitled to submit that he was only liable for the true cost as it had been
incurred by Mr Bee's insurers. The Court of Appeal held that deduction would not be permitted. Mr Bee could recover the reasonable
hire of a replacement car even though the cost of that hire had been paid directly to the hire company by his insurers rather
than by Mr Bee himself, but it followed that he would hold some of that sum in trust for the insurers. The fact that Mr Bee
was insured was irrelevant in relation to what he could recover from the tortfeasor Mr Jenson.