i-law

Lloyd's Law Reporter

HARLEY V SMITH AND KHALIFA A ALGOSAIBI DIVING AND MARINE SERVICES

[2009] EWHC 56 (QB), Queen's Bench Division, Mr Justice Foskett, 20 January 2009

Employment – Claim in tort of negligence – Limitation – Application of Saudi Arabian law – Whether ‘undue hardship’ to apply the limitation period of foreign law – Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984

The three claimants were all professional divers employed by the second defendant, Khalifa A Algosaibi Diving and Marine Services (ADAMS) which provided professional diving and marine services. The first defendant was their supervisor, employed by ADAMS. On 7 May 2003, the three divers were exposed to toxic chemicals while diving in the territorial waters of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, resulting in hospitalisation, long-term consequences and a forced change of occupation. The divers claimed in the tort of negligence. The defendants maintained (and the claimants disputed) that the claims were time-barred under Saudi law. If so, the claimants argued that the time bar should be disregarded under the Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.