i-law

Insurance Law Monthly

All risks insurance

It might ordinarily be thought (as Lord Sumner appeared to think in British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co v Gaunt [1921] 2 AC 41 at 57) that loss caused by inherent vice cannot be considered fortuitous. Mr Justice Blair’s decision in Global Process Systems Inc v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2009] EWHC 637 (Comm) provides a helpful reminder that fortuity and inherent vice are not always mutually exclusive. The case is discussed by David Turner QC and Clare Dixon of 4 New Square.

Global Process Systems: the facts

The Cendor MOPU was an offshore oil rig. It consisted of a working platform that could be raised and lowered on the rig’s three legs according to the depth of the sea in which the rig was positioned. The legs each weighed about 404 tons and were about 300 ft in length and the platform would be held at the correct height by the insertion of locking pins into ‘ pinholes’ (an inapt term to describe essentially regularly spaced rectangular openings in the legs, each with a cross-sectional area of 160 square inches). As with any rectangular opening in a metal load-bearing structure, stresses were liable to concentrate at the corners of the pinholes, which might ultimately lead to failure through ‘ stress concentration’, more simply known as metal fatigue. The risk of stress concentration was mitigated but not eliminated by the rounding of the corners of each pinhole.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2026 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.