Litigation Letter
Effect of wife’s remarriage
Dixon v Marchant [2008] EWCA Civ 11 24 January; SJ 5 February p28
The parties divorced in 1993 when a periodical payments order was made. In 2005, the husband informed the wife that he was
about to draw down his pension and as a result his income would be reduced. There was correspondence between the parties’
solicitors regarding capitalising future maintenance during which the husband repeatedly asked if the wife was cohabiting
with her long-term companion. She replied they were not cohabiting and she had no desire or intention to cohabit or remarry.
A lump sum of £125,000 was agreed and a consent order made in those terms. In 2006, the wife married. By a 2–1 majority, the
Court of Appeal refused the husband’s application to set aside the consent order on the basis that new events had occurred
which invalidated the basis and fundamental assumption upon which the order had been made. The majority of the Court held
there were no special features to the case, as in
Barder v Caluori (1988) AC 20. The husband’s persistent enquiries were to quell his suspicion that the wife was cohabiting and not to protect
himself from the risk of her remarriage. The wife’s representation that she had no desire to remarry was a statement of her
present intention at the time and the trial judge had found her to be open and honest. The risk of remarriage was a risk,
which the husband had to bear. There was no basis or fundamental assumption that, for an indefinite period to be measured
in years rather than months or weeks, the wife would not remarry. There was nothing in the agreement, which would have alerted
the judge to the parties intending to give the husband any right to claw back any part of the lump sum if the wife should
remarry soon after the payment was made. Nor was there any such term implied in the agreement. The importance of finality
in clean break cases made it clear that the application of the Barder principle is reserved for exceptional cases. The facts
of the present case fell far below the necessary standard.