Indemnity basis

Ian Franses v Somar Al Asad [2007] EWHC 2442 (Ch) 26 October

The claimant made a without notice telephone application for freezing orders which the defendant alleged was: (a) devoid of merit; (b) improperly prosecuted without notice; (c) procedurally flawed; (d) reliant on improperly obtained evidence. The defendant contended that the injunction should be discharged with an indemnity costs order.