i-law

Litigation Letter

Costs sanction alternative

Parnall v Hurst and others (ChD TLR 10 July)

At the time of service of her claim form under CPR Part 8, the claimant had failed to serve a witness statement contrary to rule 8.6, which provides that she could not rely on any written evidence at the hearing unless it had been served with the claim form or the court gave permission. Where the court could deal with the matter justly by the imposition of a penalty less grave than striking out, it should do so, for example by allowing the claimant relief from sanctions on stringent terms as to costs. In the present case, the claimant was permitted to rely on her witness statement on the terms that none of the costs incurred on her behalf up to the date of publication of judgment would be recoverable by her from the defendants, and that certain of the defendants’ costs would be paid by the claimant in any event.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.