i-law

Litigation Letter

Specific issue order was unprincipled

In re P (a child) (Parent dispute: judicial determination) (CA TLR 5 November)

Where parents with shared responsibility for their child ask the court to resolve a dispute between them as to which school that child should attend, the function of the court is to reach a clear decision to resolve the dispute. The judge’s order that the mother should determine all future questions regarding their child’s schooling following consultation with the father, was unprincipled. Nothing justifies the court abdicating its primary responsibility to decide a fundamental dispute between the parents. The court could use its power and influence to steer the parents from unnecessary discord and had to have the broadest discretion, but the parents had a right to a judicial determination.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.