i-law

Arbitration Law Monthly

Effect of tiered dispute resolution provisions

Holloway and Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), a decision of Mr Justice Ramsey, raised complex questions of how a court is to respond when one party asserts a right to go to arbitration and the other pleads the existence of a dispute resolution process which must be fulfilled before an arbitrator can even be appointed. The learned judge concluded, unsurprisingly, that the existence or otherwise of a condition precedent to arbitration is a matter to be determined by the court and not an arbitrator. The judgment also contains a very helpful analysis of the authorities on the binding effect of tiered dispute resolution provisions.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2026 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.