In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

HUDSON v. JOHN WRIGHT & SON (BLACKWALL) LTD. AND FURNESS WITHY & CO. LTD.

Lloyd's Law Reports

HUDSON v. JOHN WRIGHT & SON (BLACKWALL) LTD. AND FURNESS WITHY & CO. LTD.

[1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 151

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

Before Mr. Justice Baker

Shipbuilding and Ship-repairing Regulations, 1960 - Safe means of access - Protection of openings - Ship's painter falling into hold through inadequately guarded hatch - Whether employers and/or shipowners liable - Meaning of "fencing" - Regulations 4, 6, 26. Damages - Personal injuries - Assessment - Arthritis and casual nature of occupation to be considered.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more