A. W. & E. PALMER v. CORNHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1935) 52 Ll L Rep 78

KING'S BENCH DIVISION.

Before Mr. Justice Horridge.

Motor insurance-Accident to plaintiffs' lorry - Third-party claim against plaintiffs-Claim by plaintiffs to be indemnified by defendant insurance company-Defence that cover had been varied by mutual consent restricting the use of the lorry to the Mepal (Cambs.) district, that the accident occurred outside that district, and that therefore the insurance company were not liable-Evidence of conversations between the parties and of contemporary documents.